Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that our decision in Cabello binds all subsequent panels of this court as to aiding and abetting liability
• stating that the untimeliness of the disclosure and the prejudice can together outweigh the importance of the testimony
• noting that “[w]e review for abuse of discretion a decision not to exercise supplemental ju- risdiction”
• holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony from a late-disclosed witness where the plaintiffs lacked a good explanation for the de- lay in disclosing the witness
• noting that as to the second factor “[i]t is well-settled that a district court may deny a continuance when there is no guarantee that granting one will enable a party to [meet the need for the continuance]”
• stating that the ATS “provides no express exception for corporations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).