Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/18/2012

Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority

Citations

  • 132 S. Ct. 1702
  • 182 L. Ed. 2d 720
  • 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3108
  • 566 U.S. 449
  • 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 272
  • 80 U.S.L.W. 4339
  • 2012 WL 1314011

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining whether organizations are suable as “individuals” under the Torture Victims Protection Act
  • determining whether organizations are suable as “individuals” under the Torture Victims Protection Act
  • reminding the parties that “’reliance on legislative history is unnecessary in light of the statute’s unambiguous language’ ” (quoting Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States, 559 U.S. 229, 236 n.3, 130 S.Ct. 1324, 176 L.Ed.2d 79 (2010))
  • “[N]o legislation pursues its purposes at all costs, and petitioners’ purposive argument simply cannot overcome the force of the plain text.”
  • “[T]he text of the statute persuades us that the Act authorizes liability solely against natural persons.”
  • “[W]e presume that words used more than once in the same statute have the same meaning throughout.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

191 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.