Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff “must plead factual content,” not “vague and conclusory” assertions, to state a claim
• holding that the “war crimes exception dispenses with the state action requirement.”
• dismissing ATS claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction due to failure to allege facts creating plausible entitlement to relief
• rejecting plaintiff’s allegation that the alleged scheme necessarily required the cooperation of the alleged conspirators
• “It is not uncommon for plaintiffs to assert ATS and TVPA claims together,” based on “the same operative facts”
• “[I]n testing the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s allegations, we do not credit . . . conclusory allegations as true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).