Gozlon-Peretz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a more general statute “does not apply” because “[a] specific provision controls over one of more general application”
• holding that a more general statute “does not apply” because “[a] specific provision controls over one of more general application”
• holding that a more general statute “does not apply” because “[a] specific provision controls over one of more general application”
• noting that Congress intended to replace most forms of parole, including special parole, with supervised release
• noting that, with § 3583, Congress placed responsibility for overseeing a defendant’s postconfinement monitoring with the sen-fencing court
• noting that there was not “an effective date specified for the ADAA as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).