Skip to main content

Love v. State

Citations

  • 972 S.W.2d 114
  • 139 Oil & Gas Rep. 604
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 3756
  • 1998 WL 318970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “shareholder status *** is not a prerequisite to liability under the sham to perpetrate a fraud theory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Kidd, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.