Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding expert’s testimony (1) giving opinion that Crum & Forster’s conduct was improper and against public policy of State of Texas and (2) explaining legal meaning of Mary Carter agreement was admissible as mixed question of law and fact
• declining to address recovery under alternative theory when parties did not brief issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).