Court of Appeals of Texas· 4/21/1994

Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. v. Serv-Tech, Inc.

Citations

879 S.W.2d 89
1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 933
1994 WL 141231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a trade secret remained a secret until the issuance of a patent
“[T]here is no cause of action for misappropriation of confidential information that is not either secret or, at least substantially secret.”
where there is insufficient evidence of alter ego, rendition of judgment is required
where there is insufficient evidence of alter ego, rendition of judgment is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Robertson, Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. v. Serv-Tech, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. v. Serv-Tech, Inc.
S.D. Texas· 1992-06-18· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.