· 1/16/1997
Huff v. Harrell
Citations
- 941 S.W.2d 230
- 1996 WL 682083
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no piercing corporate veil unless fraud is proved, where plaintiffs claimed alter ego, unfair device, and denuding a corporation
- no piercing corporate veil unless fraud is proved, where plaintiffs claimed alter ego, unfair device, and denuding a corporation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seerden, Hinojosa, Yáñez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.