Skip to main content
· 1/16/1997

Huff v. Harrell

Citations

  • 941 S.W.2d 230
  • 1996 WL 682083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no piercing corporate veil unless fraud is proved, where plaintiffs claimed alter ego, unfair device, and denuding a corporation
  • no piercing corporate veil unless fraud is proved, where plaintiffs claimed alter ego, unfair device, and denuding a corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seerden, Hinojosa, Yáñez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.