Alaska Supreme Court· 8/8/1969

Love v. State

Citations

457 P.2d 622
1969 Alas. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an error is harmful if there is reasonable probability that the error affected the outcome
holding that the test for the harmlessness of non-constitutional error is whether the appellate court \can fairly say that the error did not appreciably affect the jury's verdict\
holding that, in cases where non-constitutional error has occurred, the error does not require reversal if the appellate court can reasonably conclude that the error \did not appreciably affect the jury's verdict\
holding that, for instances of non-constitutional error, the test for harmlessness is whether the appellate court \can fairly say that the error did not appreciably affect the jury's verdict\
holding that, for instances of non-constitutional error, the test for harmlessness is whether the appellate court “can fairly say that the error did not appreciably affect the jury’s verdict”
reversing admission of experiment to prove a boat's drift when differing conditions affecting drift were too great to be substantially similar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbett, Dimond, Rabinowitz, Boney, Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

248 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Love v. State

260 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.