Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because findings at issue could be harmonized under the evidence, there was no irreconcilable conflict
• stating that the trial court \must\ reconcile findings \when possible\
• stating that the trial court “must” reconcile findings “when possible”
• jury findings may not be struck down on ground of conflict if reconcilable on any reasonable basis
• apparent conflicts in jury answers must be reconciled if reasonably possible in light of the pleadings and evidence, the manner of submission, and the other findings considered as a whole
• apparent conflicts in jury answers must be reconciled if reasonably possible in light of the pleadings and evidence, the manner of submission, and the other findings considered as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).