In Re King's Estate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that direct-appeal court applied a no-evidence, instead of a factual-sufficiency, standard from “conspicuous absence of any reference to the evidence” for the losing party
• deciding that direct-appeal court applied a no-evidence, instead of a factual-sufficiency, standard from \conspicuous absence of any reference to the evidence\ for the losing party
• stating interpretation of a written contract is a matter of law if the contract is clear and unambiguous
• stating interpretation of a written contract is a matter of law if the contract is clear and unambiguous
• under abuse of discretion standard, legal and factual insufficiency are relevant factors in assessing whether trial court abused its discretion
• \so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).