Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that misrepresentation that the purchaser of a motorcycle dealership would “be able to buy parts and vehicles as [the former owner] had been buying” was actionable under DTPA section 17.46(b)(12
• holding that misrepresentation that the purchaser of a motorcycle dealership would “be able to buy parts and vehicles as [the former owner] had been buying” was actionable under DTPA section 17.46(b)(12
• holding that evidence of a misrepresentation of a party’s rights as a purchaser of a car dealership at the time of the contract supported the jury’s finding of liability under the DTPA
• holding that misrepresentation that the purchaser of a motorcycle dealership would A be able to buy parts and vehicles as [the former owner] had been buying @ was actionable under DTPA section 17.46(b)(12
• holding evidence of misrepresentations outside of contract legally sufficient to support claim for violation of DTPA section 17.46(b)(12)
• holding evidence of misrepresentations outside of contract legally sufficient to support claim for violation of DTPA section 17.46(b)(12)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).