Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 643 S.W.2d 129
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant’s right to the presumption of innocence was not violated by deputies escorting him from the courtroom in the presence of prospective jurors
  • holding that the “fact that [photographs] may have been enlarged does not render them inadmissible unless the sole purpose in the enlargement is to inflame the minds of jury”
  • holding ―all these rabbit trails, all these smoke screens that he wants you to hide behind and chase down‖ proper as comment on defendant‘s failure to produce testimony other than his own words
  • A opening remarks about evidence which was thereafter properly admitted did not constitute error @
  • “The [State’s] opening remarks about evidence which was thereafter properly admitted did not constitute error.”
  • “The opening remarks about evidence which was thereafter properly admitted did not constitute error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally, Clinton, Roberts, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.