Skip to main content

Holladay v. State

Citations

  • 709 S.W.2d 194
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when provisions of article 38.14 and its precursors were implicated, instruction was held sufficient if it: (1) defined term accomplice; (2) gave statutory prohibition against conviction on uncorroborated accomplice testimony; (3
  • “Because such a witness [i e., an accomplice] is usually deemed to be corrupt, his testimony is always looked upon with suspicion.”
  • Accomplice witness's testimony must be both material and corroborated by independent evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense.
  • where state relies on an accomplice witness’s testimony, it must be corroborated by independent evidence connecting the accused to the offense
  • witness was accomplice because he had been charged with committing same offense as appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Miller, Clinton, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.