Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 12/19/2002
In Re Commitment of Mullens
Citations
- 92 S.W.3d 881
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8962
- 2002 WL 31835068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that from basic facts, a jury may draw reasonable inferences to ultimate facts
- stating that the jury may resolve conflicts and contradictions in the evidence
- “The Fifth Amendment privilege is not self-executing; it is a privilege that must be asserted.”
- evidence relating to defined abnormality legally sufficient to prove serious difficulty in controlling behavior
- evidence relating to defined abnormality legally sufficient to prove serious difficulty in controlling behavior
- \The Fifth Amendment privilege is not self-executing; it is a privilege that must be asserted.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Burgess, Gaultney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Commitment of DayTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2011-05-12· cited 179×
- In Re Commitment of AlmaguerTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-09-25· cited 121×
- In Re the Commitment of BrowningTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-08-14· cited 88×
- in Re Commitment of Dennis Ray StutevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-10· cited 85×
- In Re the Commitment of BarbeeTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-04-20· cited 71×
- in Re Commitment of Charles Philip AndersonTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2013-01-24· cited 69×
- Adams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-05-04· cited 56×
- In Re Commitment of MoralesTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-01-23· cited 38×
- In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-30· cited 38×
- In Re Commitment of MartinezTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-01-30· cited 31×
- In re HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-12-05· cited 29×
- In re Commitment of KalatiCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-03· cited 28×
- In Re Commitment of GolliharTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-05-17· cited 27×
- In Re Commitment of Shaw.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-09-25· cited 25×
- In Re the Commitment of LoweTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-12-09· cited 25×
- in Re: The Commitment of Charles Ray DeverCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-03-23· cited 23×
- In Re COMMITMENT OF William Michael WIRTZTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-07· cited 21×
- In Re Commitment of RichardsTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-09-14· cited 19×
- in Re Commitment of David DodsonTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2014-05-29· cited 17×
- in Re Commitment of Norman Lewis EversTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2012-12-13· cited 16×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court· 2002-01-22· cited 765×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-09· cited 623×
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 533×
- Losada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-10-29· cited 505×
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1996-03-18· cited 391×
- Seling v. YoungSupreme Court· 2001-01-17· cited 287×
- Lacour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-05· cited 222×
- Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1982-07-07· cited 165×
- Beasley v. MolettTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-12-19· cited 92×
- In Re VerboisTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-02-23· cited 45×
- Harker v. Coastal Engineering, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-03-08· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.