Court of Appeals of Virginia· 5/14/1991

Lee v. Lee

Citations

404 S.E.2d 736
12 Va. App. 512
7 Va. Law Rep. 2647
1991 Va. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that grounds for an objection stated in closing argument at a bench trial preserves the issue for appellate review under Rule 5A:18
noting that “[c]ounsel may meet the mandates of Rule 5A:18 in many ways,” including by a motion to strike the evidence or by closing argument
noting that a litigant “may meet the mandates of Rule 5A:18 in many ways,” by making clear the ground for an objection in closing argument, on the court’s written order, or in a motion to set aside the verdict or a motion to reconsider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lee v. Lee

241 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.