Skip to main content
· 1/11/1991

Weidman v. Babcock

Citations

  • 400 S.E.2d 164
  • 241 Va. 40
  • 7 Va. Law Rep. 1273
  • 1991 Va. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that objections made during a hearing can preserve an issue for appeal
  • explaining that the purposes of the contemporaneous objection requirement are to allow the trial court the opportunity to rule on the issue and the opposing party the opportunity to meet the objection
  • making objections known to court through some form of written correspondence also sufficient to preserve issue for appeal
  • permitting an appeal of an issue where the party made the argument to the trial court, but signed the final order “Seen”
  • finding plaintiffs preserved issues for appeal in hearing and motion to rehear
  • finding plaintiffs preserved issues for appeal in hearing and motion to rehear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.