Andrews v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “good cause” exception did not apply because the appellant had the opportunity to bring his claim to the attention of the trial court but failed to do so
• holding that the good cause exception did not apply because the appellant had the opportunity to bring his claim to the attention of the trial court but failed to do so
• holding that the “good cause” exception did not apply because the appellant had the opportunity to bring his claim to the attention of the trial court but failed to do so
• holding that the “good cause” exception did not apply because the appellant “had ample opportunity to bring his due process claim to the attention of the trial court but failed to do so”
• holding that the “good cause” exception did not apply because the appellant “had ample opportunity to bring his due process claim to the attention of the trial court but failed to do so”
• holding that an officer had reasonable suspicion when, inter alia, he saw Andrews “had a heavy object in the center of his jacket and appeared to be trying to conceal it from the officer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).