Skip to main content

Lee v. Lee

Citations

  • 775 N.W.2d 631
  • 2009 Minn. LEXIS 859
  • 2009 WL 4347443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “income” from which spousal-maintenance payments are made is the “gross income” defined in section 518A.29
  • holding that definition of gross 5 income in section 518A.29 applies to calculations of spousal maintenance
  • holding that the provisions of section 518A.29 defining gross income apply to spousal maintenance
  • stating that a party shall receive maintenance in an amount that is reasonably needed to support one’s self
  • stating that “the 12 choice of retroactive date is committed to the discretion of the district court, as long as the date chosen is within the statutory limits”
  • stating that the district court awarded wife more maintenance than she reasonably needed to support herself and instructing the district court on remand to make findings that support the current award or a different award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magnuson, Dietzen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.