MacKie v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]y incorporating the [separation] agreement, the divorce decree satisfied the requirements of Code § 20-60.3”
• the court held that husband was obligated for health insurance coverage for wife and the child because the parties’ agreement was incorporated into the final decree, even though the final decree only mentioned health insurance coverage for the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).