Skip to main content

Copeland v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 592 S.E.2d 391
  • 42 Va. App. 424
  • 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 5A:18 barred the defendant’s sufficiency argument on an element of the offense when he failed to challenge that element at trial
  • finding that the defendant’s furtive movements along with the presence of cocaine in plain view and in proximity to the defendant supported the reasonable inference he was aware of the character and nature of the substance and its existence in the car
  • search may occur “either before or after” an arrest so long as “the search is contemporaneous with the arrest” (quoting Italiano v. Commonwealth, 214 Va. 334, 336 (1973))
  • “Furtive gestures alone have been held insufficient to establish probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata, Bumgardner, Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.