Skip to main content

Lee v. Lee

Citations

  • 507 A.2d 862
  • 352 Pa. Super. 241
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for trial court to consider Husband’s 45% reduction in income due to forced, early retirement as changed financial circumstances meriting a reduction in alimony payments
  • reversed for determining whether forced early retirement constituted a substantial change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Del Sole and Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.