Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/10/1982
Lee v. Lee
Citations
- 649 P.2d 997
- 133 Ariz. 118
- 1982 Ariz. App. LEXIS 486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the superior court’s “broad discretionary powers” to “facilitate the equitable division of the property” under A.R.S. § 25-318
- finding no jurisdiction to consider an argument raised after filing a notice of appeal
- Determining witness credibility and resolving conflicting evidence are functions for the superior court.
- explaining appellate court “acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not in [a] notice of appeal”; absent “a timely notice of appeal following entry of the order sought to be appealed, we are without jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the order sought to be appealed”
- “The court of appeals acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal.”
- appellate court “acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James Moeller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monte v. MonteNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-07-16· cited 94×
- Toth v. TothArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 83×
- Marriage of Boncoskey v. BoncoskeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-25· cited 81×
- Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-27· cited 51×
- In Re the Marriage of ThornCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-17· cited 48×
- Community Guardian Bank v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-10· cited 39×
- In re MullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-01-11· cited 31×
- Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-15· cited 28×
- Marriage of Birt v. BirtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-08-12· cited 28×
- Sample v. SampleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-29· cited 25×
- Marriage of Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-15· cited 24×
- Kellner v. KellnerNebraska Court of Appeals· 1999-04-20· cited 22×
- Schlaefer v. Financial Management Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-01-27· cited 21×
- Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-29· cited 21×
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-06-25· cited 12×
- Navajo Nation v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-06-23· cited 11×
- Biddulph v. BiddulphCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-12· cited 10×
- Ames v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-01-17· cited 9×
- Styers v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVECourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-08-29· cited 6×
- Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-04-24· cited 6×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hailey v. HaileyTexas Supreme Court· 1960-01-13· cited 111×
- Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-06· cited 76×
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court· 1914-12-29· cited 65×
- Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-19· cited 47×
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-01-11· cited 44×
- Spector v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-04· cited 22×
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-28· cited 22×
- Hanner v. HannerArizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-15· cited 19×
- China Doll Restaurant, Inc. v. SchweigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-06-06· cited 15×
- Davis v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-06-29· cited 14×
- Wayt v. WaytArizona Supreme Court· 1979-09-14· cited 13×
- Srock v. SrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-03-12· cited 11×
- Gage v. GageCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-08· cited 10×
- Rexing v. RexingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-27· cited 9×
- Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-09-18· cited 9×
- Hayne v. HayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-01-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.