Skip to main content

Larkins v. State

Citations

  • 429 P.3d 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial counsel’s decision in agreeing to the joinder of three different cases involving the abuse of multiple children in the defendant’s care was not ineffective
  • agreeing that joinder was proper for multiple counts of child abuse and one count of abuse of a vulnerable adult where charges involved four victims and occurred on different dates and at different locations
  • agreeing with district court that varying abuse charges against co-defendants involved same general accusations even though methods of injury differed
  • in context of prosecutorial misconduct, Court noted difficulty of distinguishing between “probability” and “possibility” and resolved to apply “probability” to prejudice analysis
  • “In closing arguments, a prosecutor has ‘wide latitude’ to argue the evidence in the record and all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from that evidence.”
  • “Plain error review is the same regardless of whether the issue involved jury instructions, evidence, or prosecutorial misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Burke, Davis, Fox, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.