Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 7/11/2007

Kechkar v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 500 F.3d 1080
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16590
  • 2007 WL 1991162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an alien does not “avoid[] the jurisdictional bar by arguing that the evidence was incorrectly weighed, insufficiently considered, or supports a different outcome”
  • explaining that arguments “that the evidence was incorrectly weighed, insufficiently considered, or supports a different outcome” do not raise a colorable constitutional claim
  • holding no colorable constitu- tional claim was presented when petitioner merely argued that the evidence was “incorrectly weighed, insufficiently considered, or supports a different outcome”
  • explaining that sufficiency-of-consideration arguments are not constitutional claims
  • “DHS later added a charge of misrepresenting United States citizenship. Regarding the added charge, DHS alleged that Kechkar had, on February 6, 2002, completed an employment-eligibility verification form (Form I–9) to work for Dillard’s, Inc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Ebel, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kechkar v. Gonzales

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.