Skip to main content
· 3/15/2006

Gil Bugayong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 442 F.3d 67
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6230
  • 2006 WL 626713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Bugayong’s argument that the IJ erred in evaluating his hearing testimony is, at bottom, a challenge to the IJ’s exercise of his discretion, we lack jurisdiction to consider Bugayong’s claim, notwithstanding the language of the REAL ID Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Cardamone, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.