Eighth Circuit· 3/19/2008

Rodriguez v. Mukasey

Citations

519 F.3d 773
2008 WL 724100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the explicit reference to § 1324a in § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) indicates that private employment is a ‘purpose or benefit’ of the Act”
concluding that BIA did not err in finding petitioner inadmissible because there was substantial evidence that he had “falsely represented himself as a citizen”
affirming BIA determination that alien was inadmissible under the false claim bar because he claimed to be another person who held citizenship
considering fact the petitioner “did not testify and [did] not argue that he meant to indicate that he was a national” and rejecting the petitioner’s argument he did not “understand what it meant when he marked the ‘citizen [or] national of the United States’ box”
\Rodriguez bore the burden of proving clearly and beyond doubt that he was not inadmissible.\
“Rodriguez bore the burden of proving clearly and beyond doubt that he was not inadmissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Hansen, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rodriguez v. Mukasey

22 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.