Tenth Circuit· 8/4/2020

Galeano-Romero v. Barr

Citations

968 F.3d 1176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that jurisdiction existed over the legal question of whether the Board had departed from its precedent
holding that whether the BIA followed its own precedent presents a question of law
concluding noncitizen failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim by arguing that the BIA’s failure to consider all the relevant factors, allegedly in light of overwhelming evidence that warranted a favorable exercise of discretion, violated his due-process rights
rejecting attempt to couch claims that Board “failed to consider all the relevant factors . . . in the aggregate” and “overvalued” and “undervalued” evidence as constitutional claims
“The same legal standard applies to motions to reopen and motions to remand.” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
“A petition for review does not raise a question of law by disputing the Board’s appraisal of the degree of hardship likely to [petitioner’s] wife.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.