Rodriguez-Heredia v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the absence in Utah’s identity-theft statute of a requirement that the fraudster procure something of value “appears irrelevant to whether fraud crimes are crimes of moral turpitude”
• explaining that to make this showing, petitioner “must at least point to his [or her] own case or other cases in which the state courts in fact did apply the statute in the special (nongeneric
• addressing identity-fraud statute that required “knowingly or intentionally us[ing], or attempting] to use, [another person’s identifying] information with fraudulent intent” (quoting Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-1102)
• requiring more than “a theoretical possibility” that the State would apply its statute to conduct falling outside the generic definition of a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).