Skip to main content
· 11/15/2005

Schroeck v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 947
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24529
  • 2005 WL 3047966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying fundamental fairness standard outside context of lack of counsel claim
  • describing Congress’ decision to “expressly grant[] . . . [courts of appeals] jurisdiction to review constitutional claims and legal questions raised in a petition for review” through the Real ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-13, § 106(a)(1)(A)(iii), 119 Stat. 231, 310
  • “Although adjustment of status and a waiver of inadmissibility both have certain prerequisites that must be met, both forms of relief are matters ultimately left to the agency’s discretion to decide”
  • “Although adjustment of status and a waiver of inadmissibility both have certain prerequisites that must be met, both forms of relief are matters ultimately left to the agency’s discretion to decide.”
  • describing the jurisdiction of courts of appeals
  • describing the jurisdiction of courts of appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Porfilio, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.