· 11/15/2005
Schroeck v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 429 F.3d 947
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24529
- 2005 WL 3047966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying fundamental fairness standard outside context of lack of counsel claim
- describing Congress’ decision to “expressly grant[] . . . [courts of appeals] jurisdiction to review constitutional claims and legal questions raised in a petition for review” through the Real ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-13, § 106(a)(1)(A)(iii), 119 Stat. 231, 310
- “Although adjustment of status and a waiver of inadmissibility both have certain prerequisites that must be met, both forms of relief are matters ultimately left to the agency’s discretion to decide”
- “Although adjustment of status and a waiver of inadmissibility both have certain prerequisites that must be met, both forms of relief are matters ultimately left to the agency’s discretion to decide.”
- describing the jurisdiction of courts of appeals
- describing the jurisdiction of courts of appeals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tymkovich, Porfilio, Baldock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.