Castro v. Attorney General of United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that minimizing the risk of detection is not necessarily a benefit under the law for the statute’s purposes
• stating that obtaining entry to the United States by making a false claim to citizenship at the border is a “benefit” under the Act
• observing that statutory exhaustion requirement applies to each particular issue and that failure to present issue to BIA deprives us of jurisdiction
• finding that minimizing the risk of detection is not necessarily a benefit under the law for the statute's purposes
• noting that this Court generally lacks jurisdiction to consider any issues not raised before the Board
• minimizing risk that arresting officers would report unlawful immigration status is not a relevant benefit under the statute because it is not “a benefit created by law and administered by the police”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).