Skip to main content

Joseph v. State

Citations

  • 3 S.W.3d 627
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 7145
  • 1999 WL 740438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence at revocation hearing raised inference of guilt and was sufficient for trial court to conclude appellant committed theft offense
  • holding that trial court’s hand-written notations on a revocation order were adequate to provide notice of the grounds by which defendant had violated his community supervision
  • holding that trial court’s hand-written notations on a revocation order were adequate to provide notice of the grounds by which defendant had violated his community supervision
  • holding that trial court’s hand-written notations on a revocation order were adequate to provide notice of the grounds by which defendant had violated his community supervision
  • holding that trial court’s hand-written notations on a revocation order were adequate to provide notice of the grounds by which defendant had violated his community supervision
  • noting that an attorney could not render ineffective representation to a criminal defendant on offenses for which she was not retained to represent defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles F. Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

181 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Joseph v. State

223 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.