Skip to main content
· 5/2/1991

Asberry v. State

Citations

  • 813 S.W.2d 526
  • 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 2104
  • 1991 WL 96411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a jury’s deadly-weapon finding is an affirmative finding affecting parole eligibility and involving punishment that shall be entered in the judgment
  • agreeing with Asberry regarding appellate courts’ authority to reform judgments and adopting Asberry’s reasoning
  • in absence of appropriate Rule 404(b) objection in trial court nothing is preserved for appellate review
  • in absence of appropriate Rule 404(b) objection in trial court nothing is preserved for appellate review
  • “Appellate courts have frequently reformed judgments to correct improper recitations or omissions relating to punishment.”
  • appellate court has authority to sua sponte modify incorrect judgment to make record speak the truth when it has necessary information to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.