Skip to main content

Joseph v. State

Citations

  • 571 S.E.2d 280
  • 351 S.C. 551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction for grand larceny, even though there was a valid indictment for robbery, because grand larceny is not a lesser-included offense of robbery
  • holding the circuit court did not have subject matter jurisdiction for grand larceny, even though there was a valid indictment for robbery, because grand larceny is not a lesser-included offense of robbery
  • finding words of indictment encompassed within meaning of words used in statute charged
  • finding indictment for murder sufficient where it set forth the time, place, and manner of the crime, but did not include the defendant “‘feloniously’ and ‘wilfully’ committed the murder’” and holding “the word ‘feloniously’ is encompassed in the word ‘murder’ because murder is a felony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.