Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 7/17/1985
Moore v. State
Citations
- 694 S.W.2d 528
- 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that appellant has the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel by a preponderance of the evidence
- noting that evidence of fear alone is insufficient to raise sudden passion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
309 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 1,003×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-26· cited 560×
- Escobedo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-05-19· cited 348×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-10-22· cited 336×
- Castaneda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-06-25· cited 249×
- Joseph v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-09-23· cited 226×
- Sattiewhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-25· cited 187×
- O'Hara v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 177×
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-05-17· cited 175×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 168×
- Hollis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-16· cited 130×
- Calderon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1997-05-08· cited 128×
- Ybarra v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-04-05· cited 103×
- Moreno v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1999-08-31· cited 102×
- Coleman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-04-05· cited 102×
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-11-06· cited 100×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-10· cited 91×
- Pitonyak v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-04-25· cited 89×
- Banks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1991-11-27· cited 83×
- Rios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-03-18· cited 76×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 683×
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 586×
- Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1960-06-22· cited 420×
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-18· cited 198×
- Luck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-24· cited 190×
- Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-12· cited 175×
- Hobson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-26· cited 131×
- United States v. George Edward Killian, United States of America v. George Edward Killian and Robert BrunkFifth Circuit· 1981-03-09· cited 117×
- Ewing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-04-06· cited 117×
- Ex Parte GallegosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-17· cited 110×
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-02-16· cited 110×
- Cox v. WyrickSupreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 93×
- Kucha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-06· cited 63×
- Bonfanti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-06· cited 30×
- Joseph Marino v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1979-09-07· cited 19×
- Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-22· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.