Skip to main content

Joseph v. State

Citations

  • 807 S.W.2d 303
  • 1991 WL 22992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “plain view analysis does not require actual knowledge of incriminating evidence”
  • describing “mere evidence” as evidence that is “connected with a crime” but is not “fruits, instrumentalities, or contraband”
  • relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
  • relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
  • relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
  • “The scope of a search . . . is restricted to the object of the search and the places in which there is probable cause to believe it may be found.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Overstreet, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.