Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/24/1991
Joseph v. State
Citations
- 807 S.W.2d 303
- 1991 WL 22992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “plain view analysis does not require actual knowledge of incriminating evidence”
- describing “mere evidence” as evidence that is “connected with a crime” but is not “fruits, instrumentalities, or contraband”
- relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
- relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
- relying on Nicholas in support of its conclusion that officer had no probable cause to search contents of letter where search warrant authorized seizure of marijuana
- “The scope of a search . . . is restricted to the object of the search and the places in which there is probable cause to believe it may be found.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Overstreet, Maloney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zarychta v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-05-03· cited 76×
- Barrios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-08-31· cited 74×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-03-31· cited 71×
- Fields v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1996-09-18· cited 60×
- Vafaiyan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-18· cited 56×
- Arrick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-04-24· cited 55×
- Ashton Joel Carmen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-06-30· cited 38×
- Nichols v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-02-08· cited 35×
- Kennedy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2011-03-11· cited 34×
- Braggs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-08-19· cited 25×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-12-02· cited 22×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2006-02-14· cited 22×
- State v. AndersonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-02-08· cited 19×
- Aycock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-09· cited 19×
- Vercher v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-12-15· cited 15×
- Lipscomb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-10-25· cited 11×
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-09-28· cited 10×
- GOONAN v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-01-20· cited 9×
- Durwin Young v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2018-08-16· cited 7×
- Foreman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-08-10· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 1,170×
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 948×
- Nicholas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-09-25· cited 130×
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-01-25· cited 68×
- Oubre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-03· cited 67×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-08· cited 33×
- Scoggan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-08-28· cited 18×
- Joseph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.