Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 526 S.E.2d 549
  • 272 Ga. 254
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 696
  • 2000 Ga. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that trial courts cannot exclude expert testimony when identification is essential and there is no corroborating evidence
  • appropriate to admit expert testimony involving counterintuitive issue such as absence of expected correlation between witness's expression of confidence and actual accuracy
  • appropriate to admit expert testimony involving counterin-tuitive issue such as absence of expected correlation between wit ness’s expression of confidence and actual accuracy
  • the trial court, in its sound discretion, may admit expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness testimony
  • expert testimony not necessary because an independent witness’s identification of defendant was not made under stress and was not “based on generalized racial characteristics but on individual details”
  • “[T]he admission or exclusion of [expert testimony] ‘lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, whose decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion.’ [Cit.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.