Skip to main content

State v. Coley

Citations

  • 32 S.W.3d 831
  • 2000 Tenn. LEXIS 573
  • 2000 WL 1515989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the subject of the reliability of eyewitness identification is not the proper subject of expert testimony
  • emphasizing that “the assessment of witness credibility . . . is always left to the jury”
  • basing finding of no substantial assistance to jury upon eyewitness testimony having “no scientific or technical underpinnings which would be outside the common understanding of the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holder, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.