Skip to main content

State v. Gaines

Citations

  • 926 P.2d 641
  • 260 Kan. 752
  • 1996 Kan. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[K.S.A. 60-455] does not apply to the toe sucking evidence because toe sucking is not a crime”
  • expert testimony is “ ‘not the answer to the problems surrounding eyewitness identifications’ ”
  • expert testimony regarding eyewitness identification should not be admitted
  • expert testimony regarding eyewitness identification is never admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.