Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 686 S.E.2d 764
  • 286 Ga. 222
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3670
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusion of evidence implicating another person as a participant in the crimes but not as the shooter was harmless where the evidence against the defendant was strong, including testimony from two eyewitnesses
  • question is whether the witness \obtained a concrete benefit for her testimony by which an objective comparison could be made to her potential sentences\
  • question is whether the witness “obtained a concrete benefit for her testimony by which an objective comparison could be made to her potential sentences”
  • “[T]he right of cross-examination . . . is not an absolute right that mandates unlimited be confronted with the witnesses testifying against such person.”
  • question is whether the witness “obtained a concrete benefit for her testimony by which an objective comparison could be made to her potential sentences”
  • question is whether the witness \obtained a concrete benefit for her testimony by which an objective comparison could be made to her potential sentences\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.