Skip to main content

Cox v. State

Citations

  • 398 S.E.2d 262
  • 197 Ga. App. 240
  • 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in which the trial court’s failure to rule prior to trial on the admissibility of evidence of similar transactions, as required by Rule 31.1, was not reversible error because no prejudice was shown to the defendant under the specific facts of the case
  • in which the trial court's failure to rule prior to trial on the admissibility of evidence of similar transactions, as required by Rule 31.1, was not reversible error because no prejudice was shown to the defendant under the specific facts of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Deen, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.