Skip to main content

Allen v. State

Citations

  • 602 S.E.2d 250
  • 268 Ga. App. 519
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2487
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where there is substantial corroboration of identification, a trial court does not abuse its discretion in excluding expert testimony on the issue of identification
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony of expert in eyewitness identification where victim’s identification was corroborated by evidence connecting defendant to car used in crime and to other items involved in crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Ruffin, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.