Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/13/1994
Gardiner v. State
Citations
- 264 Ga. 329
- 444 S.E.2d 300
- 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2048
- 1994 Ga. LEXIS 459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the limited exceptions to OCGA § 17-9-41 do not include jurors’ misapprehension regarding the law
- holding that the limited exceptions to OCGA § 17-9-41 do not include jurors' misapprehension regarding the law
- contention that an attorney sitting as a juror provided other jurors legal information did not trigger exception to rule that jurors cannot impeach their verdicts
- “Any asserted error with respect to juror [Schlich] is waived by defendants’ acquiescence in the curative procedure implemented by the trial court.”
- post-verdict affidavits may be considered where extrajudicial and prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury’s attention or where non-jurors interfered with the jury’s deliberations
- weight and credibility of sleep talk is province of jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Humphreys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-15· cited 98×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-07-06· cited 90×
- Sears v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-15· cited 71×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-02-28· cited 63×
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-04-28· cited 40×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-05-07· cited 14×
- Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-09· cited 13×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-05-21· cited 12×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-17· cited 12×
- Julie Pate v. Harry SadlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-05-03· cited 11×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-10· cited 10×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-24· cited 10×
- Bright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-11-15· cited 9×
- Royal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-01-22· cited 8×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-09-12· cited 7×
- Jones v. MedlinSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-11-02· cited 7×
- McCorkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-09· cited 4×
- Crowe v. TerryN.D. Georgia· 2005-09-30· cited 4×
- Brooker v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-28· cited 3×
- Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-10-23· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Isaacs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-11-30· cited 201×
- Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-13· cited 154×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-11-21· cited 100×
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-12-05· cited 93×
- Satterfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-01-14· cited 76×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-10-05· cited 60×
- Dennard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 55×
- Fugate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-06-21· cited 54×
- Dover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-11-02· cited 52×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-09-11· cited 35×
- Gainesville Radiology Group v. HummelSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-05-03· cited 22×
- Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-02-23· cited 20×
- Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-02-18· cited 19×
- Lemley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-10-05· cited 16×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-05-21· cited 13×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-02-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.