Skip to main content

Manley v. State

Citations

  • 672 S.E.2d 654
  • 284 Ga. 840
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 269
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State did not improperly comment on the veracity of its witnesses when the State argued in rebuttal that the investigators, officers and prosecuting attorney would not sacrifice their careers to frame the defendant
  • holding that the State did not improperly comment on the veracity of its witnesses when the State argued in rebuttal that the investigators, officers and prosecuting attorney would not sacrifice their careers to frame the defendant
  • applying contemporaneous objection rule to claim that court erred in responding to note from jury
  • prosecutor’s comments in rebuttal to defense counsel’s closing argument did not constitute opinion about veracity of witnesses
  • property receipt, which specified the location from which a certain knife had originally been seized, was properly admitted under the business records exception
  • prosecutor’s comments in rebuttal to trial counsel’s closing argument did not constitute opinion about veracity of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton, Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.