Widman v. Widman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding mathematical mistakes must be brought to the attention of the family court to be preserved for appeal
• holding an issue must be ruled upon by the family court or raised in a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to be preserved for appellate review
• holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the family court or raised in a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to be preserved for appellate review
• holding issue cannot be raised for first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by trial judge to be preserved for appellate review
• holding issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review
• finding husband’s argument that the family court made a mathematical error was unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to argue the position in the lower court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).