Bodkin v. Bodkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \any request at the 59(e) stage of the proceedings was untimely because Wife could have raised it at trial\
• recognizing parties may become responsible for attorney's fees if they fail to cooperate and their behavior prolongs the proceedings
• indicating an abuse of discretion does not occur absent legal error or factual findings without evidentiary support
• stating any request at the 59(e) stage of the family court proceedings would be untimely when it could have been raised at trial
• finding the family court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony when it “made findings of fact on all of the relevant factors, and the record contained] evidence to support each of those findings”
• noting the appellate court's role is not to reweigh the alimony factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).