Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/20/2004

Bowman v. Bowman

Citations

591 S.E.2d 654
357 S.C. 146
2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that passive post-filing changes in the appreciation or depreciation of marital assets may be considered by the family court in determining an equitable apportionment of the marital estate.
holding where the husband actively and intentionally depleted his retirement account, the account should be valued at the filing date
holding when a party could have discovered the new evidence prior to trial, the party is not entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(2) or (3)
holding when the husband actively and intentionally depleted his retirement account, the account should be valued as of the filing date
holding a Rule 60(b) motion is subject to abuse of discretion review
finding when husband actively and intentionally depleted his retirement account, the account should be valued at the filing date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Hearn, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.