Mallett v. Mallett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding property classified as nonmarital because the “purpose” of the benefit was to replace earnings after the date commencement of marital litigation
• holding when the husband's insurance business decreased passively due to market forces, \it would be grossly unfair to value this asset\ at date of filing
• holding property classified as nonmarital because the “purpose” of the benefit was to replace earnings after the date commencement of marital litigation
• affirming valuation of husband’s business at time of final hearing where business had declined in value by more than $30,000 since commencement of the action
• stating the division of marital property should fairly reflect each spouse's contribution to the property's acquisition
• affirming valuation of husband’s business at time of final hearing where business had declined in value by more than $30,000 since commencement of the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).