King v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing the family court does not err in determining whether to award alimony when its decision is based on factual findings with evidentiary support
• finding an issue was not preserved because the appellant did not object when the family court ruled from the bench and did not file a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to alter or amend after the court issued its order
• \The appellate court looks to the overall fairness of the apportionment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reiss v. Reiss
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-02-23· cited 25×
• Bojilov v. Bojilov
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 18×
• Srivastava v. Srivastava
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×
• DiMarco v. DiMarco
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-08-15· cited 15×
• Stoney v. Stoney
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-29· cited 12×
• Way v. Way
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-05-09· cited 8×
• Ricigliano v. Ricigliano
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-15· cited 8×
• SUSAN R. v. Donald R.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-02· cited 7×
• Crossland v. Crossland
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-07· cited 7×
• Lewin v. Lewin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 5×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 4×
• Stoney v. Stoney
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-27· cited 4×
• Conits v. Conits
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-16· cited 3×
• Wannamaker v. Wannamaker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-11· cited 1×

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Glasscock v. Glasscock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
• South Carolina Department of Transportation v. First Carolina Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-27· cited 147×
• Patel v. Patel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
• Doe v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-03· cited 120×
• Nienow v. Nienow
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-09· cited 103×
• Donahue v. Donahue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
• Griffith v. Griffith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 65×
• Scott v. Scott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 59×
• Mallett v. Mallett
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 59×
• Smith v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-19· cited 59×
• Davis v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 49×
• Hardy v. Hardy
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-04-15· cited 47×
• Craig v. Craig
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-07-25· cited 47×
• Pirri v. Pirri
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 44×
• Deidun v. Deidun
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-11-22· cited 31×
• Noll v. Noll
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-11-28· cited 26×
• Degenhart v. Burriss
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-08-16· cited 26×
• Thomson v. Thomson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-25· cited 13×