Skip to main content

Doe v. Doe

Citations

  • 478 S.E.2d 854
  • 324 S.C. 492
  • 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding judgments are not final until written and entered, and until written and entered, the judge retains discretion to change his mind and amend his ruling accordingly
  • the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined the judge addressed the relevant factors under section 20-7-472 with sufficiency for the reviewing court to conclude the judge was cognizant of statutory factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heakn, Howell, Stilwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.